Introduction
A state-directed economic model, which refers to a system wherein the state maintains a guiding role in the economy based on the functioning of a market mechanism that is instrumental to the state, has experienced a rapid proliferation during recent decades. As a typical example of a state-directed economies, China has developed a highly institutionalised economic system characterised by a deep integration between the state and the market. This book aims to answer the questions as to how and why the prevalence of the state-directed economic model in China has challenged the existing international order.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
eBook EUR 106.99 Price includes VAT (France)
Hardcover Book EUR 137.14 Price includes VAT (France)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
GDP at Market Prices (Current US$) (2016). The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD. Accessed 1 September 2018.
See, e.g., Bremmer (2009).
Ibid, p. 40.
‘Capitalism’, in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (11th edn, Merriam-Webster 2003).
Whitley (1999), pp. 6–7.
SIEs can be used to refer to the enterprises in which a state entity holds shares. These enterprises, compared to traditional SOEs, usually possess an independent personality and maintain a modernised corporate governance mechanism. However, the term ‘SIEs’ is often seen as interchangeable with and thus conflated with the term ‘SOEs’. See Chap. 4 of this book.
See, e.g., Szamosszegi and Kyle (2011).
Lardy (2014), Chapter 3.
Liebman and Milhaupt (2015), p. xiv.
Black et al. (2012b).
Black et al. (2012a).
Mises and Greaves (2011), pp. 10–12.
Mandel (1986), p. 6.
Lang (2011), pp. 3–10. See also Gilpin (2011), pp. 309–312.
Chapter 5, Sect. 5.1 of this book. See also WTO The Multilateral Trading System — Past, Present and Future. WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/inbrief_e/inbr01_e.htm. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Chapter 5, Sects. 5.2 and 5.3 of this book.
Chapter 5, Sect. 5.1.
See, e.g., Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt, for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (11 June 1975) preamble.
See, e.g., Model Text [Draft] Agreement […] Between The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of […] for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (2008) preamble. also German Model Treaty — Treaty Between the Federal Republic of Germany and […] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (2008) preamble.
See, e.g., Treaty Between the United States of America and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (11 April 2005).
Although scholars have consistently delved into how China is involved in various international economic regimes since China has opened up to the international market, only a few articles directly link China’s involvement with its state-directed economic system. Du (2014). See also Wu (2015) pp. 313–350.
Chapter 6, Sect. 6.3 of this book.
‘Public Law’, in A Dictionary of Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press 2015).
‘Private Law’, in A Dictionary of Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press 2015).
Walker (2002), p. 259.
See, e.g., Sui and Ma (2015), pp. 145–148.
Clarke (2015), pp. 35–47.
Ibid, p. 47.
Clarke (2004), pp. 27–30. See also, Weintraub and Kumar (1997), pp. 8–10.
Bremmer (2010), p. 26.
Lin and Milhaupt (2013).
Szamosszegi and Kyle (2011), pp. 1–3.
Marx (2010), Preface.
Marx (1976), pp. 290–291.
Harvey (2015), pp. 62–29.
Xie and Yang (2013), pp. 13–14.
Yu (2007), pp. 25–27.
Wang (2013a, b), pp. 19–20.
Lu and Lv (2013), pp. 10–11.
Liu (2009), pp. 13–14.
See, e.g., Bremmer (2010).
Ljungqvist et al. (2015), pp. 31–32.
Musacchio and Lazzarini (2012), pp. 38–39.
Zhang (2010), pp. 64–65.
This purpose is central to the philosophy of the ‘socialist market economy’. See Yu (2007).
Huchinson and Duncan (2012), p. 83.
In the most recent five-year plan in China, it is noted that the leadership of the state and the CPC should continue to be essential to China’s economic development. See Guojia Wunian Guihua (国家五年规划) [National Five-Year Guideline>. China. http://www.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/wngh/1163433.htm. Accessed 1 September 2018 (in Chinese).
See, e.g., Chap. 2, Sect. 2.2 of this book.
Wright and Nguyen (2000), pp. 169–170.
Daftary (2014), pp. 711–712.
Chapter 6, Sect. 6.3.1.2 of this book.
See, e.g., Chap. 2, Sect. 2.1.3 of this book.
Legislation Law of the People’s Republic of China (Adopted on 15 March 2000).
Chapter 5, Sects. 5.2 and 5.3 of this book.
Chapter 6, Sects. 6.2.2 and 6.3.3.1.
Chapter 6, Sect. 6.2.2. See also Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft for Comments) (2015).
Bibliography
Books
- Bremmer I (2010) The end of free market: who wins the war between states and corporations? Portfolio, New York Google Scholar
- Gilpin R (2011) Global political economy: understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton BookGoogle Scholar
- Harvey D (2015) Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Profile Books, London Google Scholar
- Lang A (2011) World Trade Law after neoliberalism: re-imagining the Global Economic Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford BookGoogle Scholar
- Lardy NR (2014) Markets over Mao: The rise of private business in China. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC Google Scholar
- Marx K (1976) Capital: a critique of political economy (trans: Mandel E), vol 1. Penguin Books, London Google Scholar
- Marx, K (2010) A contribution to the critique of political economy. Springer Google Scholar
- Von Mises L, Greaves BB (2011) Interventionism: an economic analysis. Citeseer Google Scholar
- Weintraub J, Kumar K (1997) Public and private in thought and practice: perspectives on a grand dichotomy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
- Whitley R (1999) Divergent capitalisms: the social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Book Sections
- Clarke D (2015) Blowback: how China’s efforts to bring private-sector standards into the public sector backfired. In: Liebman BL, Milhaupt CJ (eds) Regulating the visible hand?: the institutional implications of Chinese state capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 29–48 ChapterGoogle Scholar
- Liebman BL, Milhaupt CJ (2015) Introduction: the institutional implications of China’s economic development. In: Liebman BL, Milhaupt CJ (eds) Regulating the visible hand?: the institutional implications of Chinese State capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford ChapterGoogle Scholar
- Walker N (2002) Culture, democracy and the convergence of public law: some scepticisms about scepticism. In: Beaumont P, Lyons C, Walker N (eds) Convergence and divergence in European public law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 257–272 Google Scholar
- Wu M (2015) The WTO and China’s unique economic structure. In: Liebman BL, Milhaupt CJ (eds) Regulating the visible hand?: the institutional implications of Chinese state capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 313–350 ChapterGoogle Scholar
Electronic Articles
- Ljungqvist A et al. (2015) State capitalism vs. private enterprise. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w20930. Accessed 1 Sept 2018
- Musacchio A, Lazzarini SG (2012) Leviathan in business: varieties of state capitalism and their implications for economic performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12–108. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/9056789. Accessed 1 Sept 2018
- Scott BR (2016) The political economy of capitalism. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 07-037. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=23129. Accessed 1 Sept 2018
- Sparrow MK (2014) Managing the boundary between public and private policing. New Perspectives in Policing. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247182.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2018
- Szamosszegi A, Kyle C (2011) An analysis of state-owned enterprises and state capitalism in China. Capital Trade Incorporated. http://www.uscc.gov/Research/analysis-state-owned-enterprises-and-state-capitalism-china. Accessed 1 Sept 2018
Journal Articles
- Bremmer I (2009) State capitalism comes of age: the end of the free market. Foreign Affairs 88(3):40–55 Google Scholar
- Clarke J (2004) Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. J of Soc Policy 33(01):27–48 ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daftary D (2014) Development in an era of economic reform in India. Dev Change 45(4):710–731 ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Du M (2014) China’s state capitalism and world trade law. Int Comp Law Q 63(02):409–448 ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukuyama F (1989) The end of history? The National Interest 16:3–18 Google Scholar
- Huchinson T, Nigel D (2012) Defining and describing what we do: doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Rev 17:83 ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin L-W, Milhaupt CJ (2013) We are the (National) champions: understanding the mechanisms of state capitalism in China. Stanford Law Rev 65:697–759 Google Scholar
- Liu Z (2009) Zhongguo Moshi’ Bu Shi Guojia Zibenzhuyi (“中国模式”不是国家资本主义) [‘China Model’ is not state capitalism]. Hongqi Wengao 15:11–14. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Lu W, Lv L (2013) Dangdai Zhongguo Guojia Zibenzhuyi Lilun de Beilun yu Gailiang (当代中国国家资本主义理论的悖论与改良) [The paradox and improvement of contemporary Chinese state capitalist theory]. Econ Res Guid 209:9–11 Google Scholar
- Mandel E (1986) In defence of socialist planning. New Left Rev 159:5 Google Scholar
- Sui R, Ma Y (2015) Gongfa yu Sifa de Liangxing Hudong: Dangdai Zhongguo Fazhi Jianshe de Bijingzhilu (公法与私法的良性互动:当代中国法治建设的必要之路) [The benign interaction between public law and private law: the necessary road for the construction of the rule of law in contemporary China]. Theory and Reform 1:145 Google Scholar
- Wang B (2013a) Jiyu Guoji Shijiao de Guoyou Qiye Butie Ruogan Wenti Tantao (基于国际视角的国有企业补贴若干问题探讨) [Several issues on subsidies provided by SOEs from an international perspective]. Caizheng Jiandu 15:66–68. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Wang H (2013b) ‘Guojia Zibenzhuyi’ zai Sikao (“国家资本主义”再思考) [Rethinking ‘State Capitalism’]. Foreign Theoretical Trends 3:17. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Wright PC, Nguyen VT (2000) State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in Vietnam–Perceptions of strategic direction for a society in transition. Int J Public Sector Manag 13(2):169–177 ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie L, Yang X (2013) Guojia Zibenzhuyi’ Ping Xi (“国家资本主义”评析) [Comment and analysis on ‘State Capitalism’]. Foreign Theor Trends 3:9–16. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Yu P (2007) ‘Guojia Zibenzhuyi’ yu Luohou Guojia Shehuizhuyi Jianshe (“国家资本主义”与落后国家社会主义建设) [‘State Capitalism’ and the Socialist construction in less developed countries]. Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories 7:20–27. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Zhang J (2010) Guojia Zibenzhuyi de Moshi ji qi Fazhan Zhuangkuang (国家资本主义的模式及其发展状况) [The model and the development of state capitalism]. Contemp Econ Res 3:64. (in Chinese) Google Scholar
Primary Sources
- German Model Treaty — Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and […] concerning the encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments (2008) Google Scholar
Theses
- Liu Y (2004) Zhongguo Guojia Zibenzhuyi Wenti Yanjiu (中国国家资本主义问题研究) [Study on Chinese state capitalism]. Northeast Normal University) Google Scholar
Web Pages
- GDP at market prices (Current US$) (2016) The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD. Accessed 1 Sept 2018